Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
0.24 AUD | -7.69% | -12.73% | +14.29% |
May. 03 | Banks, real estate stocks lead gains in Aussie shares; US jobs data, RBA policy eyed | RE |
Apr. 24 | Australian Shares Finish Session Flat as Q1 Inflation Eases | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
Strengths
- Thanks to a sound financial situation, the firm has significant leeway for investment.
- The company shows low valuation levels, with an enterprise value at 0.06 times its sales.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- Growth remains a strong point in this company. In their sales forecast, analysts sound optimistic with regard to sales prospects.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company's profitability before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization characterizes fragile margins.
- Low profitability weakens the company.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- For the past year, analysts have significantly revised downwards their profit estimates.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- Most analysts recommend that the stock should be sold or reduced.
- The three month average target prices set by analysts do not offer high potential in comparison with the current prices.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- The group usually releases earnings worse than estimated.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Gold
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
+14.29% | 130M | B | ||
-1.76% | 46.89B | A- | ||
+18.58% | 32.38B | B | ||
-5.93% | 28.89B | B+ | ||
+10.26% | 23.88B | B | ||
+4.98% | 10.88B | B | ||
+23.70% | 9.65B | B- | ||
-.--% | 8.66B | - | B- | |
+12.47% | 8.1B | A- | ||
+1.10% | 8.04B | B- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- SBM Stock
- Ratings St Barbara Limited