Market Closed -
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
29.34 USD | +2.37% | +1.91% | -19.77% |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental configuration.
Weaknesses
- According to Standard & Poor's' forecast, revenue growth prospects are expected to be very low for the next fiscal years.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- The company is in debt and has limited leeway for investment
- The valuation of the company is particularly high given the cash flows generated by its activity.
- For the last twelve months, sales expectations have been significantly downgraded, which means that less important sales volumes are expected for the current fiscal year over the previous period.
- The company's sales previsions for the coming years have been revised downwards, which foreshadows another slowdown in business.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- The appreciation potential seems limited due to the average target prices set by the analysts covering the stock.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- The group usually releases earnings worse than estimated.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Aerospace & Defense
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-19.77% | 1.74B | C+ | ||
+21.10% | 135B | C | ||
+10.66% | 78.71B | B | ||
+1.47% | 70.3B | A- | ||
+19.72% | 50.04B | B | ||
+35.64% | 42.48B | A- | ||
+0.34% | 40.09B | B+ | ||
+40.06% | 31.63B | C- | ||
+78.54% | 23.8B | B | ||
+22.61% | 23.9B | C- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- MRCY Stock
- Ratings Mercury Systems, Inc.