Delayed
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
0.45 AUD | +2.27% | -6.25% | -36.17% |
Mar. 19 | New Zealand Shares Rise Tuesday as Services Sector Continues Rebound; Scott Technology's CEO Resigns | MT |
Mar. 19 | KMD Brands Swings to Loss in Fiscal H1 on Lower Demand | MT |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- From a short-term investment perspective, the company presents a deteriorated fundamental situation
Strengths
- With regards to fundamentals, the enterprise value to sales ratio is at 0.69 for the current period. Therefore, the company is undervalued.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- Given the positive cash flows generated by its business, the company's valuation level is an asset.
- The average target price set by analysts covering the stock is above current prices and offers a tremendous appreciation potential.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company sustains low margins.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- The sales outlook for the group was lowered in the last twelve months. This change in forecast points out a decline in activity as well as pessimistic analyses of the company.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last four months, earnings estimated by analysts have been revised downwards with respect to the next two years.
- The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been significantly revised downwards over the last four months.
- The average consensus view of analysts covering the stock has deteriorated over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Prospects from analysts covering the stock are not consistent. Such dispersed sales estimates confirm the poor visibility into the group's activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- Financial statements have repeatedly disappointed market stakeholders. Most often, they were below expectations.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Sector: Other Specialty Retailers
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-36.17% | 214M | - | ||
+37.92% | 16.82B | B+ | ||
0.00% | 7.35B | - | ||
-10.38% | 4.45B | B- | ||
-12.08% | 2.07B | A- | ||
+6.23% | 517M | - | - | |
-9.27% | 245M | - | - | |
+11.13% | 238M | - | - | |
-19.05% | 169M | B+ | ||
-25.94% | 120M | C- |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Technical analysis
- Stock Market
- Equities
- KMD Stock
- KMD Stock
- Ratings KMD Brands Limited