Fitch Ratings has assigned JSC Uzbek Metallurgical Plant (UMK) a Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of 'BB-' with a Stable Outlook.

The rating is equalised with that of its sole parent Uzbekistan (BB-/Stable), due to strong ties between the company and the state, as per Fitch's Government-Related Entities (GRE) Rating Criteria.

We view UMK's Standalone Credit Profile (SCP) at 'b+', which reflects its small scale of operations, low-cost operations due to favourable scrap procurement, its solid position on the steel market in Uzbekistan, and current focus on long steel products with medium-term diversification into flat products and broader range of end-markets.

UMK's expansion strategy is likely to result in negative free cash flow (FCF) for the next three years, before it can deleverage and return to a more conservative financial profile.

The SCP is constrained by the company's small scale, medium execution risks linked to its ambitious expansion and capex plans, exposure to the volatility of raw materials that must be imported, concentration of operations in one country, and evolving corporate governance.

Key Rating Drivers

Very Strong Support: We view the status, ownership and control factor under our GRE Criteria as 'Strong' as the state is UMK's sole shareholder but may sell around a quarter of the company. We assess support track record as 'Very Strong' because while less than 25% of UMK's debt is government- guaranteed, a majority of local facilities are provided by state-owned banks, a new facility is provided by state funds, and government support is a prerequisite for its new project finance facility to be finalised. Other forms of support include EUR140 million equity injection from the state to support UMK's Casting and Rolling Complex project and full rights to all Uzbek scrap.

'Moderate' Socio-Political Implications: UMK employs 12,000 people, is the seventh-largest tax contributor to the country, and has the fourth-highest net income earned and dividends paid to the state budget. We see 'Moderate' socio-political implications from a UMK default because over 90% of its products supports the country's construction sector. UMK is responsible for 80% of all steel products produced in Uzbekistan and more than a third of steel products consumed within the country. Its default could hit further development of the national steel industry and may hinder the development of the construction and metals & mining sectors.

'Strong' Financial Implications: We view financial implications of a default as 'Strong' because we view the company's debt as a proxy for the government's, but the size of UMK's debt is substantially smaller than that of the government.

New Project to Diversify Output: The Casting and Rolling Complex project is a transformative hot-rolled sheet project for the company and the country's steel industry. The project will increase UMK's steel-making capacity to 2.1 mtpa from 1 mtpa and double total capacity for finishing lines to 2.2mtpa. This provides diversity to its current output of longs and grinding balls.

Execution Risk: UMK has limited experience in delivering new projects and is exposed to the risk of cost overruns and delays. The project is estimated to cost around EUR672 million, of which EUR220 million is provided by a new project financing facility, a state-funded EUR110 million loan, EUR140 million equity injection, EUR89 million from local banks, and the remainder from UMK's own funds.

High Leverage: Under our rating case, we estimate UMK's EBITDA to reach UZS2.1 trillion-UZS2.4 trillion in 2023-2024 (USD170 million-USD180 million), and UZS3.3 trillion-UZS3.8 trillion (USD240 million-USD280 million) when the new project is fully ramped up by 2026. At end-2021 the company had around UZS2 trillion (USD200 million) of total debt, or 1.0x EBITDA. We expect debt to rise to 2.8x EBITDA in 2023 on large capex, before moderating towards 1.7x as higher EBITDA from those assets feeds through and capex normalises. No dividend is expected in 2022, given construction costs and its target debt-to-EBITDA of 3x.

Steel Market Moving Beyond Peak: Global steel companies reported exceptionally high steel margins in 2H21. However, the energy crisis and waning global GDP growth are leading to market moderation linked to some demand destruction and as steel companies start to compete for volumes in many markets. Steel prices have eased materially in July and August, but overall 2022 will still be a solid year, given that sales to June plus order books at that time provide for a robust earnings outlook for the year. We expect the global steel market to start normalising in 2023.

Exposure to Russian Raw Materials: UMK currently relies partially on Russia for certain raw materials including hot briquetted iron (HBI, used for crude steel production). Historically, this exposure has amounted to less than 1/3 of raw material costs. With an additional mini mill and the Casting and Rolling Complex project coming onstream by 2024, the need to import more semi-finished products will substantially increase. The HBI market is fairly small and it may be difficult to substitute Russian suppliers.

Improving Corporate Governance: As part of its preparation for an international IPO, UMK is developing its corporate governance structures with a set of targets, including IFRS accounts publication since 2017, increasing transparency and developing a decarbonisation strategy. Additionally, the company is in the process of developing a long-term financial model and ESG strategy, and has optimised its ownership structure of dependent and subsidiary companies.

Derivation Summary

UMK's peers are Brazilian steel and iron ore producer Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais SA (Usiminas) (BB/Stable), Interpipe Holdings Plc (CCC-), and JSC Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex (BB-/Stable).

Usiminas is much larger in scale, has 150% self-sufficiency in iron ore, greater operational diversification with two steel-producing units and a range of steel-processing capabilities. The company produces a large proportion of high value-added products and its business is highly exposed to the local steel industry in Brazil. Usiminas has used substantial cash flows generated from iron ore during 2019-2022 and post-Covid-19 steel recovery to substantially reduce gross debt with a forecast gross debt/EBITDA at or below 1.2x in 2022 and 2023.

UMK has 1 mt crude steel capacity with 1.1mt finishing capacity that is capable of achieving EBITDA around USD150 million-USD200 million before its expansion project. Interpipe has similar scale, but produces mostly high value-added products for international markets, a broad range of pipe products and train wheel sets. Interpipe's rating reflects operational challenges arising from its asset concentration in Ukraine.

Almalyk focuses largely on copper and gold mining, exports the majority of its products, and has roughly 10x the EBITDA of UMK. Nevertheless, both companies maintain strong links to the Uzbek government, currently depend mostly on single assets within Uzbekistan, have ambitious growth plans to complete transformational new projects, and stand to benefit from evolving corporate governance.

Key Assumptions

Volumes in line with management's guidance to double by 2026 when the expansion project is at full production

Steel prices normalising by 2023

Average EBITDA margin of 24%-25% over the next four years

Capex of EUR672 million for the Casting and Rolling Complex by 2024

Equity injection of EUR140 million from the state by 2024

No dividend until 2024, followed by absolute payment in line with management's guidance

Effective tax rate on average at 18%, in line with management's guidance

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:

A positive rating action on the sovereign would be replicated in UMK's rating

Gross debt/EBITDA and funds from operations (FFO) gross leverage below 2.0x on a sustained basis could be positive for the SCP but not necessarily the IDR

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:

A negative sovereign rating action

Material weakening of ties between the company and the state

Gross debt/EBITDA and FFO gross leverage above 3.0x on a sustained basis could be negative for the SCP but not necessarily the IDR

Unremedied liquidity issues could be negative for the rating

Uzbekistan

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:

Macro: Significant narrowing of Uzbekistan's GDP per capita gap vs. peers', for example underpinned by the implementation of structural reforms, and without creating macro-economic imbalances

Structural: Significant improvement of governance standards including rule of law, voice and accountability, regulatory quality and control of corruption

External and Public Finances: Significant strengthening of the sovereign's fiscal and external balance sheets, for example, through sustained high commodity export prices and windfall revenues

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:

External Finances: Rapid weakening of external finances, for example through a sustained widening of the current account deficit derived from a permanent decline in remittances or increase in trade deficit, combined with persistently low net foreign direct investments, resulting in a significant decline in foreign-exchange reserves or rapid increase in external liabilities

Public Finances: A marked worsening in the government debt-to-GDP ratio or the erosion of the sovereign fiscal buffers, for example due to an extended period of low growth or crystallisation of contingent liabilities

Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10111579.

Liquidity and Debt Structure

Comfortable Liquidity: At end-2021 UMK's cash position amounted to USZ2 trillion against gross debt of USZ2 trillion raised mostly from state-owned banks. New debt will be composed of a new EUR220 million project finance facility and a EUR110 million loan from the state. Given the funding already in place and upcoming capex for the Casting and Rolling Complex, we expect comfortable liquidity and UMK to have well-covered cash needs with flexibility to pay dividends opportunistically.

Issuer Profile

UMK is a small producer of long steel products and grinding balls in Uzbekistan.

Date of Relevant Committee

01 September 2022

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.

Public Ratings with Credit Linkage to other ratings

UMK's rating is equalised with the sovereign rating

ESG Considerations

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg

(C) 2022 Electronic News Publishing, source ENP Newswire