Fitch Ratings has affirmed Frontera Energy Corporation's Long-Term Foreign and Local Currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) at 'B'.

In addition, Fitch has affirmed Frontera's senior unsecured notes at 'B'/'RR4'. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Frontera's ratings and Outlook reflect its small and concentrated production profile, fixed production costs, and gross leverage, which is defined as total debt to EBITDA, of 0.8x as of the LTM September 2022. The company had Proved Developed Producing (PDP) reserve life of 2.3 years and 1P reserve life of 8.6 years applying 2021 year-end reserve figures. Fitch forecasts the company's total debt to 1P of USD4.30boe and USD16.00boe per PDP of reserve by YE 2022.

Key Rating Drivers

Small Production Profile and Reserve Life: Frontera's ratings are constrained by its production size. Fitch expects Frontera's production to be close to 42,000 boed in 2022, and average increase to 50,000 boed between 2023-2025, approximately evenly split between light and heavy crude. The increase in production will be supported by the company's development and near-field exploration portfolio in Colombia and exploration portfolios in Ecuador.

The ratings incorporate Frontera's weak PDP reserve life of 2.3 years as of YE 2021, the lowest among Colombian peers, and its concentrated production profile, where Quifa represents nearly 40% of daily production (16,150 boed), followed by Guatiquia at almost 22% (8,949 boed) and CPE-6 12% (4,916 boed). The company operates all three blocks and owns 100% of both Guatiquia and CPE-6, and has a joint venture, working interest of 60%, with Ecopetrol for Quifa.

Fixed Cost Production Profile: Frontera has a fixed production profile that limits its financial flexibility. The company's half-cycle cost is estimated at USD29boe in 2022, in line with 2021 and 2020. The high production cost is mostly due to its fixed transportation cost, which is estimated to average USD9.5boe (gross) per annum over the rated horizons. Fitch expects the company to hedge a minimum 40% of total production to offset the higher costs and protect it from price volatility.

Leverage Profile: Frontera's gross leverage, defined as total debt/EBITDA, is strong for its rating category. Fitch estimates gross leverage will be 0.7x in 2022, assuming an EBITDA of USD659 million and total debt of USD508 million. Fitch expects total debt/proved developed producing (PDP) to be USD16.00/boe by YE 2022, which is high for its rating category, and total debt/1P to be USD4.30 in 2022. Fitch estimates EBITDA/ interest paid to be 14.1x in 2022 and average over 12.0x over the rated horizon.

Free Cash Flow Negative: Frontera is expected to be free cash flow negative throughout the rating horizon, due to its high capex costs. Capex is estimated to average $20 boe per annum between 2022 through 2025, and Fitch assumes it will be financed with internally generated cash flows. Capex costs are mostly attributed to developmental capex to replenish reserves and expand its PDP reserve life, which is the lowest amongst its Colombian peers at 2.3 years. This high capex spending limits the company's financial flexibility to scale back investments during volatile pricing environments, which occurred in 2020. Frontera's strong liquidity supports it investment plan.

Derivation Summary

Frontera Energy's credit and business profile are comparable to other small independent oil producers in Colombia. The ratings of Geopark Limited (B+/Stable), SierraCol Energy Limited (B+/Stable), and Gran Tierra Energy International Holdings Ltd. (B/Stable) are all constrained to the 'B' category or below, given the inherent operational risk associated with small scale and low diversification of oil and gas production.

Frontera's production profile compares favorably with other 'B' rated Colombian oil exploration and production companies. Over the rated horizon, Fitch expects Frontera's production will average 48,000boed in line with Geopark and higher than SierraCol at 40,000 boed as well as Gran Tierra at 38,000 boed. Frontera's PDP reserve life is 2.3 years and 8.6 years for 1P in 2021 is below Geopark at 4.2 years for PDP and 6.7 years for 1P and SierraCol at 4.7 years for PDP and 7.1 years for 1P, while Gran Tierra is at 4.3 years for PDP and 6.9 years for 1P.

Frontera's half-cycle production cost was USD29.0/boe in 2021 and full-cycle cost was USD42.6/boe higher than Geopark, which is the lowest cost producer in the region at USD14.9/boe and USD28.6/boe, SierraCol at USD19.9/boe and USD28.5/boe, and Gran Tierra at $25. 0/boe and USD40.2/boe. Frontera's higher production cost is mainly attributed to a fixed transportation cost (gross) estimated to average USD9.6/boe.

Fitch expects Frontera's strong capital structure's gross leverage will average 1.0x over the rated horizon and total debt/PDP of USD14.4/boe and total debt/1P of USD3.9/boe. Geopark is forecast to have higher gross leverage of 1.5x, but stronger debt/PDP of USD8.5/boe and 1P of USD3.4/boe and SierraCol's metrics are similar at 1.0x, USD9.3/boe and USD6.4/boe, respectively. While Gran Tierra's metrics are at 2.0x, USD13.0/boe and USD8.2/boe, respectively.

Key Assumptions

Fitch's price deck for Brent oil prices of USD100 in 2022, USD85 in 2023, USD65 in 2024 and USD53 in 2025;

Vasconia discount of USD5 per barrel of crude oil (bbl) over the rated horizon;

Gross Production of 41,600boed in 2022; average of 50,300boed between 2023-2025;

Gross Production costs averaging USD11.3/barrel;

Gross Transportation costs averaging USD9.5/barrel;

Gross SG&A cost averaging USD4.0/barrel;

Average annual capex of USD325 million between 2022-2025;

No dividends payments over the rated horizon;

Annual dividends received from ODL of USD35 million per year through 2025;

Stock repurchase of USD90 million in 2022.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:

Net production maintained at 45,000boed or more, while maintaining a 1P reserve life of seven years or greater and PDP reserve life of at least four years;

Maintain a conservative financial profile with gross leverage of 2.5x or below and total debt/1P reserves of USD8/boe or below.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:

Sustainable production size declines to below 30,000boed;

1P reserve life declines to below seven years on a sustained basis;

A significant deterioration of credit metrics to total debt/EBITDA of 3.0x or more;

A persistently weak oil and gas pricing environment that impairs the longer-term value of its reserve base;

Sustained deterioration in liquidity and operating profile, particularly in conjunction with more aggressive dividend distributions than previously anticipated.

Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10111579.

Liquidity and Debt Structure

Strong Liquidity: Fitch views the company's liquidity position as strong, supported by cash on hand and a manageable debt amortization profile. As of Sept. 30, 2022, Frontera reported USD253.6 million of unrestricted cash and USD55.6 million of separate restricted cash. This liquidity position is robust compared $128.5 million of short-term debt.

Issuer Profile

Frontera Energy Corporation is an oil and gas company incorporated in Canada with operations in Latin America, primarily in Colombia with assets in Guyana.

Sources of Information

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.

ESG Considerations

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg.

(C) 2022 Electronic News Publishing, source ENP Newswire