Delayed
Other stock markets
|
5-day change | 1st Jan Change | ||
0.485 HKD | +1.04% | -.--% | -37.82% |
May. 11 | China's Country Garden repays onshore coupons within grace period | RE |
May. 11 | Country Garden says it has repaid onshore coupons within grace period | RE |
Summary
- On the basis of various fundamental qualitative criteria, the company appears to be particularly poorly ranked from a medium and long-term investment perspective.
- According to Refinitiv, the company's ESG score for its industry is good.
Strengths
- The company is one of the most undervalued, with an "enterprise value to sales" ratio at 0.39 for the 2023 fiscal year.
- The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.
- The average target price set by analysts covering the stock is above current prices and offers a tremendous appreciation potential.
Weaknesses
- As estimated by analysts, this group is among those businesses with the lowest growth prospects.
- The company's profitability before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization characterizes fragile margins.
- The company has insufficient levels of profitability.
- The company is in a hindered financial situation with significant debt and rather low EBITDA levels.
- For the last twelve months, the trend in sales revisions has been clearly going down, which emphasizes downgraded expectations from the analysts.
- For the last 12 months, analysts have been regularly downgrading their EPS expectations. Analysts predict worse results for the company against their predictions a year ago.
- For the last twelve months, the analysts covering the company have given a bearish overview of EPS estimates, resulting in frequent downward revisions.
- Most analysts recommend that the stock should be sold or reduced.
- Over the past four months, analysts' average price target has been revised downwards significantly.
- The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.
- Over the past twelve months, analysts' consensus has been significantly revised downwards.
- Sales estimates for the next fiscal years vary from one analyst to another. This clearly highlights a lack of visibility into the company's future activity.
- The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.
- The group usually releases earnings worse than estimated.
Ratings chart - Surperformance
Chart ESG Refinitiv
Sector: Real Estate Development & Operations
1st Jan change | Capi. | Investor Rating | ESG Refinitiv | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-37.82% | 1.72B | B+ | ||
+14.64% | 29.29B | B- | ||
+36.86% | 28.36B | B- | ||
-8.82% | 25.5B | B | ||
+13.69% | 24.47B | A- | ||
+50.95% | 23.83B | A- | ||
+11.92% | 21.57B | A | ||
+1.39% | 19.32B | B- | ||
+31.19% | 16.73B | B | ||
-1.82% | 15.96B | B+ |
Financials
Valuation
Momentum
Consensus
Business Predictability
Environment
Governance
Controversy
- Stock Market
- Equities
- 2007 Stock
- Ratings Country Garden Holdings Company Limited