Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) of China International Capital Corporation Limited (CICC) and China International Capital Corporation (International) Limited (CICC International) at 'BBB+'.

The Outlook is Stable. Fitch has also affirmed CICC's and CICC International's Shareholder Support Rating (SSR) at 'bbb+'.

Fitch has also affirmed the 'BBB+' ratings on the medium-term note (MTN) programme and the notes issued by CICC Hong Kong Finance 2016 MTN Limited (CICC Hong Kong Finance).

CICC, China's flagship investment bank, is 40.1% owned by parent Central Huijin Investment Ltd. (Central Huijin), which is authorised by the State Council to make equity investments in major state-owned financial enterprises.

CICC International is CICC's sole offshore investment-banking platform and wholly owned subsidiary. The subsidiary established CICC Hong Kong Finance as an offshore SPV to launch its MTN programme.

Key Rating Drivers

Support-Driven Ratings: CICC's IDRs are underpinned by Fitch's expectation that extraordinary support would be forthcoming from its largest shareholder, Central Huijin, in the event of stress. This reflects CICC's key role in undertaking social and political functions for the parent via its leading investment banking franchise, the shareholder's controlling ownership and strong oversight of CICC's management, and the reputational risks to the parent if CICC were to default.

The rating also takes into consideration the company's linkage with the Chinese sovereign (A+/Stable), which we believe to be the ultimate source of extraordinary support to CICC. The Stable Outlook reflects our expectation that the Central Huijin will continue to be CICC's largest shareholder given its important role in cross-border financing and assisting in the country's capital-market development, and CICC's linkage with parent as well as the high likelihood of extraordinary support from Central Huijin, if needed, will remain intact in the medium term.

Stable SROE: The sector risk operating environment (SROE) score remains at 'bbb-'/stable. China's evolving capital market exposes participants to high business volatility on top of economic challenges and sustained uncertainty. However, the country's continued financial reforms are positive for the development of the securities sector, with increasing capital market depth and breadth bolstering long-term growth potential. We also expect continued enhancement of the regulatory framework to instil financial discipline and control systemic risk.

The SROE score is above the implied 'bb' category score. We believe China's robust external finances and a record of stable economic performance, which are incorporated in the Chinese sovereign rating (A+/Stable), will provide greater financial and economic stability than the implied SROE score indicates.

High Policy Alignment: We expect CCIC to sustain its sound performance, with the authorities aiming at achieving greater capital efficiency and financial system stability. CICC has strong investment-banking capability and a record of supporting capital-market development as well as the government's objective to promote direct financing.

Satisfactory Return Profile: We expect CICC to sustain stronger profitability than peers, supported by its strong investment-banking franchise and lower reliance on the brokerage business. CICC has delivered returns higher than the sector over the past years. Its profitability, measured by operating income/average equity, was annualised at 10.8% in 1Q23, up from 9.9% in 2022. The increase was due mainly to fair value gains from CICC's proprietary trading positions, as capital market sentiment and the economy improved after China dismantled Covid-19 measures.

Leverage Above Peers: We view CCIC's leverage as commensurate with its more diversified business model and higher balance-sheet usage activities than peers, even though its leverage has generally been higher than the sector average. Relevant risks are controlled within manageable levels in CICC's developed risk framework, and mitigated by its adequate capital base in absolute terms.

Reliance on Wholesale Funding: CICC is exposed to credit market volatility in a similar way to peers, as it relies on wholesale funding and high use of repos for short-term funding. However, the risk is reduced by its sufficient liquidity coverage buffers and adequate underlying collateral against the repos, mainly in the form of government bonds or corporate bonds with adequate credit quality. Our analysis of its funding and liquidity profile also takes into consideration that CICC would benefit from its shareholder background when securing financing in the market.

Parent Underpins Subsidiary Rating: The ratings on CICC International are aligned with those of CICC, reflecting our assessment of an extremely high possibility of extraordinary support from CICC. The wholly owned subsidiary is CICC's sole offshore investment-banking platform, integral to CICC's strategy to expand its international franchise. It is also highly integrated into CICC's operations and is a core subsidiary.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action/Downgrade

Any change to the Chinese sovereign's rating that would affect Fitch's assessment of Central Huijin's credit profile, is likely to affect the ratings on CICC and its offshore subsidiary to the same magnitude.

IDRs - CICC AND CICC International

A widening of the notching from the Chinese sovereign rating would be triggered by a significant weakening in CICC's role as a conduit to support financial-sector reform and the development and stability of China's capital markets. A reduction in Central Huijin's propensity to provide support, possibly reflected in a weakening in the linkage between Central Huijin and CICC through changes in the ownership structure, could also trigger a downgrade. A persistently weak performance could also lead to a reassessment of support.

CICC International could be downgraded if CICC shows signs of a reduced propensity and ability to support the subsidiary.

SENIOR DEBT - CICC HONG KONG FINANCE

The ratings on the MTN programme and notes issued under the programme are directly linked to CICC's propensity and ability to support the guarantor or issuer. The ratings on the notes will be downgraded following a similar rating action on CICC International.

Any change in Fitch's view on the effectiveness of the deed of guarantee given by CICC International may also result in a downgrade to the MTN programme and the notes.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Upgrade

IDRs - CICC AND CICC International

CICC's ratings could be upgraded if Fitch believes it has become more systemically important to the Chinese government - although this seems remote relative to the size of the large state-owned banks - or if the entity undertakes more significant policy roles.

A rating upgrade on CICC International will follow a similar rating action on CICC's ratings.

SENIOR DEBT - CICC HONG KONG FINANCE

The ratings on the MTN programme and the notes issued under the programme will be upgraded if there is a similar rating action on CICC International.

Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario

International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions and Covered Bond issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10111579

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.

ESG Considerations

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg

(C) 2023 Electronic News Publishing, source ENP Newswire