28 April 2020
The Company Announcements Office
ASX Limited
4 Floor, 20 Bridge Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000
BYRO INDUSTRIAL MAGNETITE PROJECT
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Athena Resources Limited is pleased to announce the Company has completed test work in cooperation with ALS Laboratories to manufacture a dense aggregate composite for use in heavy machinery counterweights and special purpose heavy construction concrete.
Key Aggregate Characteristics
- High Degree of Particle Size Control and Distribution, (PSD).
- Compaction Ratio Suitable for Addition of Cements
- Low Water Requirement to Achieve High Strength Concrete.
- Relative Density of 4.05t/m3
- Low Impurities
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020
Sample Preparation
Sample was prepared from reverse circulation (RC) drilling completed in September 2017 from the Mt Narryer Mining Lease. The drill holes (AHRC0091 and AHRC0092), targeted the natural iron ore oxide, magnetite.
AHRC0091: Collar, 396017mE, 7062836mN. End of hole 90m, RL 310m, Ore Zone 40m, in fresh rock at depth of 44m.
AHRC0092: Collar 396017mE, 7062859mN. End of hole 66m, RL 310m Ore Zone 24m in fresh rock at depth of 42m.
.
Applied Technology
1: Particle Size Distribution
RC chips retrieved from drill return were washed and screened to 13 size fractions from 20mm to <0.075mm, shaken through a nest of sieves from largest down to smallest. Each fraction was then subject to a single pass of low intensity magnetic separation (900 Gauss), discarding the nonmagnetic aggregates.
Products of the various size fractions were then aggregated according to percent by weight to achieve an aggregate requirement meeting the concrete additive standard of AS2758.1.
The aggregated target composite was then tested by ALS laboratories sieving the combined sample in accordance with the requirements of AS 1141.11.1. The sample of aggregate was shaken through a nest of sieves from largest down to smallest. The product was reported as the percentage passing each individual sieve size. The test was performed in a dry state ('dry grading').
Table 1: Sample Composite Target
Byro Industrial Heavy Aggregate Composite (8mm)
Product Composition
AHN Constituents | AHN Sieve mm | component 2Kg % Split | 2Kg Amount in | |
grams | grams | |||
11% of Product | 12.5>8 | 20.0 | 220 | |
8.0>5.0 | 200.0 | |||
5.0>4.0 | 180.0 | |||
53% of Product | 4.0>3.0 | 480.0 | 1060 | |
3.0>1.0 | 400.0 | |||
12% of Product | 1>0.850 | 138.0 | 240 | |
0.85>0.300 | 102.0 | |||
0.300>0.25 | 66.7 | |||
24% of Product | 0.250>0.15 | 33.3 | 480 | |
0.150>0.075 | 100.0 | |||
0.075 | 280.0 |
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020
Table 2: Product Particle Size Distribution Result
A20448
ATHENA RESOURCES (DRY SIZING ON COMP#1)
Operation | Size | Weight | Weight | Weight |
(mm) | (g) | (%) | % < | |
Screening | 12.500 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 |
8.000 | 10.9 | 0.7 | 99.3 | |
5.000 | 141.3 | 9.6 | 89.7 | |
4.000 | 192.8 | 13.1 | 76.6 | |
3.150 | 242.6 | 16.5 | 60.1 | |
1.000 | 418.1 | 28.4 | 31.8 | |
0.850 | 22.3 | 1.5 | 30.2 | |
0.300 | 80.1 | 5.4 | 24.8 | |
0.250 | 25.2 | 1.7 | 23.1 | |
0.150 | 39.6 | 2.7 | 20.4 | |
0.075 | 112.7 | 7.6 | 12.8 | |
-0.075 | 188.0 | 12.8 | ||
Initial | 1473.6 | 100.0 |
The results of the particle size distribution (Table 2), are shown in a PSD curve, Figure 1 below, and can be compared to the typical concrete grading curve in Figure 2.
Mt NARRYER SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE | |||
% PASSING | |||
0.010 | 0.100 | 1.000 | 10.000 |
SIZE (mm) |
Figure 1: Mt Narryer size distribution curve
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020
Figure 2: Typical concrete grading curve.
The Mt Narryer heavy aggregate product PSD conforms within grading deviation specifications in accordance with industry standard AS 2758.1. The aggregate PSD can also be custom manufactured to meet the requirement of special industry needs.
2. Compaction Ratio
The Mt Narryer heavy aggregate product was subject to compaction tests identifying "Uncompacted Bulk Density", (Table 3), and "Compacted Bulk Density", (Table 4).
Table 3. Uncompacted Bulk Density. | Table 4. Compacted Bulk Density | |||||||
Uncompacted Bulk Density - | Compacted Bulk Density - | |||||||
Head | Head | |||||||
Bulk | Bulk | |||||||
Sample ID | Density | Sample ID | Density | |||||
(kg/L) | (kg/L) | |||||||
Comp#1 | 2.26 | |||||||
Comp#1 | 2.63 | |||||||
The result demonstrates pore space capacity for the aggregate to cater for cement binders. Importantly the result shows a low compaction ratio. Excess pore space requires excess cement binder and water.
3. Water Requirement.
Low uncompacted pore space demonstrates the Mt Narryer dense aggregate product has appropriate grading. Well graded aggregates have a lower water requirement, (Figure 3), a key factor in concrete strength. A lower water cement ratio produces higher strength concrete. The low compaction ratio of the Mt Narryer dense aggregate is suitable to be used in high strength concrete greater than 55 -100Mpa.
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020
Figure 3. Low Water Requirement to Achieve High Strength Concrete. (AS2758.1.)
4: Relative Density
Results from a specific gravity test to determine the density of the Mt Narryer aggregate product was greater than 4 tonnes per cubic meter. The product, when used in heavy concrete will allow savings in concrete volume and excavation costs for construction as well as effective counterweight properties.
Table 5. A20448 - SG Results
SG - Head
Sample ID | SG |
Comp#1 4.05
The very high density of the Mt Narryer aggregate producing a heavy concrete in excess of 4 tonnes per cubic meter has a collective quality with a high strength concrete. High strength concrete has a cement:aggregate ratio of 1:5. (Cement having a specific gravity of 3.15t/m3).
5. Low Impurities
The product chemical analysis was completed by ALS Laboratories using industry standard XRF assay techniques. The largest stable components from chemical analysis, (78%), was made up of mostly natural magnetite iron oxide and lesser silicate. Very low levels of impurities were recorded.
Table 6. Assay of the Mt Narryer Heavy Aggregate Product and Impurities
A20448 - Athena Resources - Head Assay (Comp#1)
Al2O3 | Cl | CaO | K2O | Na2O | P | S |
(%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) |
0.50 | 0.005 | 1.23 | 0.017 | 0.038 | 0.049 | 0.043 |
Elements such as sulphur, phosphorous, chloride and sodium reduce the durability of concrete and shorten the structural lifespan. Assays showing these elements are shown in Table 6 above.
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020
The product development and test work described in this announcement demonstrate the Byro Industrial Magnetite Project can produce a heavy aggregate product suitable for heavy machinery counterweights and special purpose heavy construction concrete. Inherent advantages of the natural magnetite from the Byro Industrial Magnetite Project lends itself to many advantages, both economic and environmental, over standard concrete aggregates.
Advantages
- Increased weight for a given volume
- Reduced heat of hydration
- High submerged/saturated density
- High radiation shielding characteristics
- Space saving
- Noise and vibration dampening
- Thermal energy storage
Although the test work was focused on heavy machinery counterweights and special purpose heavy construction concrete, there are a broad array of other applications for high density concrete aggregates.
Applications
- Loose ballast:
- Offshore ballasting of rigs and caissons
- Scour protection for underwater structures of pipelines
- Ground stabilization - to reduce piling
- Heavy concrete:
- Under water concrete (tunnels, pipeline mattresses)
- Counterweights (bridges, locks, sluices, elevators, excavators)
- Coastal protection (breakwaters, precast antifer cubes)
- Pipe coating (negative buoyancy coatings)
- Radiation shielding (medical & nuclear)
Athena Resources is continuing to develop the Byro Industrial Magnetite Project. The company holds a high priority on product and market development alongside encryption of the resource towards mining approvals. The heavy aggregate for concrete is included in the growing number of industrial magnetite products being developed by Athena from the Byro Industrial Magnetite Project.
Ongoing Product Development Includes
- Byro Industrial Magnetite for DRI Feed for powder metals and alloys.
- Byro Industrial Magnetite Catalyst Grade for ammonia and fuel synthesis.
- Byro Industrial Magnetite DMS for coal washeries.
- Byro Industrial Magnetite 3D Printing specification.
- Byro Industrial Magnetite for Black Pigment.
- Byro Industrial Magnetite for Water Filtration.
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020
About Athena Resources Limited.
Athena Resources Limited (ASX:AHN), which is based in Perth was listed on the ASX in 2006 and currently has 300,605,208 million shares on issue. Athena owns a 100% interest in the Byro Project through its subsidiaries Complex Exploration and Byro Exploration where it is exploring for copper, nickel, PGE's and iron ore. The Figure below, shows the current tenement holdings.
Regional Project Location
Edmond Edwards Executive Director of Athena has authorised release of this announcement to the ASX.
Yours faithfully
Ed Edwards
Executive Director
ATHENA RESOURCES LIMITED
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020
JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1 report template
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||||
Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg | • This Report refers to magnetic | ||||||
cut channels, random chips, or | susceptibility readings taken | |||||||
techniques | ||||||||
specific specialised industry standard | from RC drill hole AHRC0091 | |||||||
measurement tools appropriate to the | and AHRC0092. The | |||||||
minerals under investigation, such as | measurement tool used for | |||||||
down hole gamma sondes, or | Magnetic susceptibility was a | |||||||
handheld XRF instruments, etc). | hand held KT-10 with serial | |||||||
These examples should not be taken | number # 8791 | |||||||
as limiting the broad meaning of | ||||||||
sampling. | ||||||||
• Include reference to measures taken | • | Magnetic susceptibility readings | ||||||
to ensure sample representivity and | were taken to determine | |||||||
the appropriate calibration of any | appropriate samples with the | |||||||
measurement tools or systems used. | average reading noted from | |||||||
scanning mode | ||||||||
• Aspects of the determination of | • 'Reverse circulation drilling was | |||||||
mineralisation that are Material to the | used to obtain 1 m samples | |||||||
Public Report. In cases where | ||||||||
'industry standard' work has been | ||||||||
done this would be relatively simple | ||||||||
(eg 'reverse circulation drilling was | ||||||||
used to obtain 1 m samples from | ||||||||
which 3 kg was pulverised to produce | ||||||||
a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other | ||||||||
cases more explanation may be | ||||||||
required, such as where there is | ||||||||
coarse gold that has inherent | ||||||||
sampling problems. Unusual | ||||||||
commodities or mineralisation types | ||||||||
(eg submarine nodules) may warrant | ||||||||
disclosure of detailed information. | ||||||||
Drilling | • Drill type (eg core, reverse | • | Reverse Circulation (RC) | |||||
circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary | ||||||||
techniques | ||||||||
air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) | ||||||||
and details (eg core diameter, triple | ||||||||
or standard tube, depth of diamond | ||||||||
tails, face-sampling bit or other type, | ||||||||
whether core is oriented and if so, by | ||||||||
what method, etc). | ||||||||
Drill sample | • Method of recording and assessing | • | Samples recovered from | |||||
core and chip sample recoveries and | cyclone splitter using 1m interval | |||||||
recovery | ||||||||
results assessed. | composites | |||||||
• Measures taken to maximise sample | • Collection of RC Chips from | |||||||
recovery and ensure representative | sieved sample | |||||||
nature of the samples. | • No bias was observed between | |||||||
• Whether a relationship exists | recovery and sample quality or |
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||||||
between sample recovery and grade | loss or gain | |||||||||
and whether sample bias may have | ||||||||||
occurred due to preferential loss/gain | ||||||||||
of fine/coarse material. | ||||||||||
Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have | • Drill chips have been | ||||||||
been geologically and geotechnically | geologically logged as well as | |||||||||
logged to a level of detail to support | recording major geotechnical | |||||||||
appropriate Mineral Resource | features observable in chip over | |||||||||
estimation, mining studies and | the full depth of the holes. | |||||||||
metallurgical studies. | ||||||||||
• Whether logging is qualitative or | ||||||||||
quantitative in nature. Core (or | ||||||||||
costean, channel, etc) photography. | ||||||||||
• The total length and percentage of | ||||||||||
the relevant intersections logged. | ||||||||||
Sub- | • If core, whether cut or sawn and | • | RC Drilling | |||||||
whether quarter, half or all core | ||||||||||
sampling | ||||||||||
taken. | ||||||||||
techniques | ||||||||||
• If non-core, whether riffled, tube | • Samples were dry rotary split | |||||||||
and sample | ||||||||||
sampled, rotary split, etc and whether | ||||||||||
preparation | sampled wet or dry. | |||||||||
• For all sample types, the nature, | • | Industry standard sampling | ||||||||
quality and appropriateness of the | preparation procedures were | |||||||||
sample preparation technique. | used | |||||||||
• Quality control procedures adopted | • | Industry standard sampling | ||||||||
for all sub-sampling stages to | preparation procedures were | |||||||||
maximise representivity of samples. | used | |||||||||
• Measures taken to ensure that the | • | Industry standard sampling | ||||||||
sampling is representative of the in | procedures were used | |||||||||
situ material collected, including for | • | No field duplicate/second-half | ||||||||
instance results for field | sampling | |||||||||
duplicate/second-half sampling. | ||||||||||
• Whether sample sizes are | • Average sample size from | |||||||||
appropriate to the grain size of the | splitter was 5kg | |||||||||
material being sampled. | ||||||||||
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests
- The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.
- For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
- Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.
The measurement tool used was
- handheld KT-10 with serial number # 8791 using units of 10*-3 Standard SI units
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020 | ||||||||
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||||
Verification | • The verification of significant | • No adjustments have been | ||||||
intersections by either independent | made to readings | |||||||
of sampling | ||||||||
or alternative company personnel. | • Assays have been verified | |||||||
and assaying | ||||||||
• The use of twinned holes. | using standard QA QC methods | |||||||
• Documentation of primary data, data | ||||||||
entry procedures, data verification, | ||||||||
data storage (physical and electronic) | ||||||||
protocols. | ||||||||
• Discuss any adjustment to assay | ||||||||
data. | ||||||||
Location of | • Accuracy and quality of surveys used | • Hand held GPS | ||||||
to locate drill holes (collar and down- | ||||||||
data points | ||||||||
hole surveys), trenches, mine | ||||||||
workings and other locations used in | ||||||||
Mineral Resource estimation. | ||||||||
• Specification of the grid system used. | ||||||||
• Quality and adequacy of topographic | ||||||||
control. | ||||||||
Data spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of | • Collar and end of hole surveys | ||||||
Exploration Results. | were taken and combined with | |||||||
and | ||||||||
• Whether the data spacing and | collar location at surface | |||||||
distribution | ||||||||
distribution is sufficient to establish | ||||||||
the degree of geological and grade | ||||||||
continuity appropriate for the Mineral | ||||||||
Resource and Ore Reserve | ||||||||
estimation procedure(s) and | ||||||||
classifications applied. | ||||||||
• Whether sample compositing has | ||||||||
been applied. | ||||||||
Orientation of | • Whether the orientation of sampling | Both holes were drilled down dip | ||||||
achieves unbiased sampling of | into the ore body. No bias | |||||||
data in | ||||||||
possible structures and the extent to | applies. | |||||||
relation to | ||||||||
which this is known, considering the | ||||||||
geological | deposit type. | |||||||
structure | ||||||||
• If the relationship between the drilling | • No sampling bias was | |||||||
orientation and the orientation of key | introduced by drilling orientation | |||||||
mineralised structures is considered | ||||||||
to have introduced a sampling bias, | ||||||||
this should be assessed and reported | ||||||||
if material. | ||||||||
Sample | • The measures taken to ensure | • Sample security was maintained | ||||||
sample security. | during all stages of preparation | |||||||
security | ||||||||
Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews | • Sample security was maintained | ||||||
of sampling techniques and data. | during all stages of preparation | |||||||
reviews | ||||||||
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||||||
Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, | • Tenement referred to in this | |||||||
location and ownership including | report M09/168 is 100% | ||||||||
tenement and | |||||||||
agreements or material issues with | Athena owned and operated | ||||||||
land tenure | |||||||||
third parties such as joint ventures, | within native title claim WAD | ||||||||
status | partnerships, overriding royalties, | 6033/98, made on behalf of | |||||||
native title interests, historical sites, | the Wajarri Yamatji People. | ||||||||
wilderness or national park and | |||||||||
environmental settings. | |||||||||
• The security of the tenure held at the | • The tenements are in good | ||||||||
time of reporting along with any | standing and no known | ||||||||
known impediments to obtaining a | impediments exist. | ||||||||
licence to operate in the area. | • See tenement listing attached. | ||||||||
Exploration | • Acknowledgment and appraisal of |
exploration by other parties. | |
done by | |
other parties | |
Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and |
style of mineralisation. | |
- Historic exploration within the project area largely confined to south of a line extending from Imagi Well to the Byro East intrusion (Melun Bore). The earliest work with any bearing on Athena's activities is that of
Electrolic Zinc Co (1969) exploring for chromatite at Imagi Well, followed closely by Jododex Australia (1970-1974) at Byro East. Much of the exploration of a more regional nature is of limited use either because of the vagaries of the accuracy of positional information and the limited range of elements analysed. More recent surveys pertinent to
Athena's current investigations include that of Redback Mining (1996-2002), Yilgarn Mining Limited (2003-2008) and Mithril (2007, JV with Yilgarn) at Byro East, and Western Mining Corporation (1976-1979) and Precious Metals Australia at Imagi Well. Newcrest Mining carried out a limited reconnaissance RAB drilling programme for platinum just to the east of Byro homestead (1998-1990). - Upper amphibolite to granulite metamorphic facies with mafic to ultramafic intrusive. Granite and migmatite are common
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020
Criteria
Drill hole Information
JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||
• A summary of all information material | • | AHRC0091,Collar, | ||
to the understanding of the | 396017mE, 7062836mN. | |||
exploration results including a | End of hole 90m, RL 310m, | |||
tabulation of the following information | Ore Zone 40m, in fresh rock | |||
for all Material drill holes: | ||||
at depth of 44m. | ||||
o easting and northing of the drill | ||||
• | AHRC0043, Collar | |||
hole collar | ||||
396017mE, 7062859mN. | ||||
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - | ||||
End of hole 66m, RL 310m | ||||
elevation above sea level in | ||||
Ore Zone 24m in fresh rock | ||||
metres) of the drill hole collar | ||||
o dip and azimuth of the hole | at depth of 42m | |||
o down hole length and interception | ||||
depth | ||||
o hole length. | ||||
• If the exclusion of this information is | • | No information has been | ||
justified on the basis that the | excluded | |||
information is not Material and this | ||||
exclusion does not detract from the | ||||
understanding of the report, the | ||||
Competent Person should clearly | ||||
explain why this is the case. | ||||
Data aggregation methods
• In reporting Exploration Results, | • min max, ave, techniques were |
weighting averaging techniques, | used, using magnetic |
maximum and/or minimum grade | susceptibility data to blend |
truncations (eg cutting of high | sample representative of the |
grades) and cut-off grades are | average statistical magnetic |
usually Material and should be | susceptibility of the ore. |
stated. | |
• Where aggregate intercepts | • aggregation has been used and |
incorporate short lengths of high | is restricted to sample intervals |
grade results and longer lengths of | which do not overlap assayed |
low grade results, the procedure | composite boundaries |
used for such aggregation should be | |
stated and some typical examples of | |
such aggregations should be shown | |
in detail. | |
• The assumptions used for any | • No metal equivalent are referred |
reporting of metal equivalent values | to in this report |
should be clearly stated. | |
Relationship between mineralisatio n widths and intercept
These relationships are particularly | The results do not relate to |
intercept width | |
important in the reporting of | |
Exploration Results. | |
• If the geometry of the mineralisation | The results do not relate to |
with respect to the drill hole angle is | intercept width |
known, its nature should be reported | |
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020 | ||||||||||
Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||||||
lengths | • . | • All reference to widths are down | ||||||||
• If it is not known and only the down | hole length, true width is not | |||||||||
hole lengths are reported, there | calculated. The results do not | |||||||||
should be a clear statement to this | relate to intercept width | |||||||||
effect (eg 'down hole length, true | ||||||||||
width not known'). |
Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with |
scales) and tabulations of intercepts | |
should be included for any significant | |
discovery being reported These | |
should include, but not be limited to a | |
plan view of drill hole collar locations | |
and appropriate sectional views. |
- Refer to Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in the body of the report
Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting of all | • This report contains all |
Exploration Results is not | meaningful results for this report | |
reporting | ||
practicable, representative reporting | ||
of both low and high grades and/or | ||
widths should be practiced to avoid | ||
misleading reporting of Exploration | ||
Results. | ||
Other | • Other exploration data, if meaningful | • This report contains all |
and material, should be reported | meaningful drilling results for this | |
substantive | ||
including (but not limited to): | report | |
exploration | ||
geological observations; geophysical | ||
data | survey results; geochemical survey | |
results; bulk samples - size and | ||
method of treatment; metallurgical | ||
test results; bulk density, | ||
groundwater, geotechnical and rock | ||
characteristics; potential deleterious | ||
or contaminating substances. | ||
Further work | • The nature and scale of planned | Industrial magnetite product |
further work (eg tests for lateral | development is ongoing | |
extensions or depth extensions or | ||
large-scalestep-out drilling). | ||
• Diagrams clearly highlighting the | na | |
areas of possible extensions, | ||
including the main geological | ||
interpretations and future drilling | ||
areas, provided this information is not | ||
commercially sensitive. | ||
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020
INTEREST IN MINING TENEMENTS
Athena Resources Limited 100%
Byro | |
E09/1507 | E - Exploration License |
E09/1552 | |
E09/1637 | |
E09/1781 | |
E09/1938 | |
M09/166 | M- Mining Lease |
M09/168 |
Cautionary Notes
Forward Looking Statements
This announcement contains certain statements that may constitute "forward looking statements". Such statements are only predictions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual values, results, performance achievements to differ materially from those expressed, implied or projected in any forward looking statements.
Drilling to date supports aspects of the estimates in this report which were published earlier this year. The quantity and grade reported is conceptual in nature. There has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource. Further exploration is warranted to improve understanding and reduce uncertainty about this body.
JORC Code Compliance Statement
Some of the information contained in this announcement is historic data that have not been updated to comply with the 2012 JORC Code. The information referred to in the announcement was prepared and first disclosed under the JORC Code 2004 edition. It has not been updated since to comply with the JORC Code 2012 edition on the basis that the information has not materially changed since it was last reported.
Competent Persons Statement
The information included in the announcement was compiled by Mr Liam Kelly, an employee of Athena Resources Limited. Mr Kelly is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, and has sufficient relevant experience in the styles of mineralisation and deposit styles under consideration to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in "The Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code 2012 Edition)". Mr Kelly consents to the inclusion of the information in the announcement in the context and format in which it appears and that the historical information was compliant with the relevant JORC Code, 2004 Edition, and new information announced in this report is compliant with the JORC Code 2012 Edition.
Competent Persons Disclosure
Mr Kelly is an employee of Athena Resources and currently holds securities in the company.
BYRO - IRON ORE - HIGH GRADE MAGNETITE
April 2020
Attachments
- Original document
- Permalink
Disclaimer
Athena Resources Limited published this content on 28 April 2020 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 19 May 2020 08:32:03 UTC