Summary

● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.

● Overall, and from a short-term perspective, the company presents an interesting fundamental situation.

● The company's Refinitiv ESG score, based on a ranking of the company relative to its industry, comes out particularly well.


Strengths

● The company is in a robust financial situation considering its net cash and margin position.

● Its low valuation, with P/E ratio at 2.94 and 3.28 for the ongoing fiscal year and 2024 respectively, makes the stock pretty attractive with regard to earnings multiples.

● The stock, which is currently worth 2023 to 0.12 times its sales, is clearly overvalued in comparison with peers.

● The company appears to be poorly valued given its net asset value.

● Given the positive cash flows generated by its business, the company's valuation level is an asset.

● The company is one of the best yield companies with high dividend expectations.

● Sales forecast by analysts have been recently revised upwards.

● For the past year, analysts covering the stock have been revising their EPS expectations upwards in a significant manner.

● For the last 4 months, the company has been enjoying highly positive EPS revisions, which were frequently and significantly raised.

● Analysts have a positive opinion on this stock. Average consensus recommends overweighting or purchasing the stock.

● The average target price set by analysts covering the stock is above current prices and offers a tremendous appreciation potential.

● The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been strongly revised upwards over the last four months.

● The group usually releases upbeat results with huge surprise rates.


Weaknesses

● With relatively low growth outlooks, the group is not among those with the highest revenue growth potential.

● The company's earnings growth outlook lacks momentum and is a weakness.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.