Fitch Ratings has downgraded four and affirmed nine classes of
Following their downgrades, Fitch has assigned Negative Rating Outlooks on two classes. The Rating Outlooks for two of the affirmed classes were revised to Negative from Stable.
Fitch has also affirmed 13 classes of
RATING ACTIONS
Entity / Debt
Rating
Prior
CGCMT 2015-GC29
A-3 17323VAY1
LT
AAAsf
Affirmed
AAAsf
A-4 17323VAZ8
LT
AAAsf
Affirmed
AAAsf
LT
AAAsf
Affirmed
AAAsf
A-S 17323VBC8
LT
AAAsf
Affirmed
AAAsf
B 17323VBD6
LT
AA-sf
Affirmed
AA-sf
C 17323VBE4
LT
A-sf
Affirmed
A-sf
D 17323VAA3
LT
B+sf
Downgrade
BB+sf
E 17323VAC9
LT
CCCsf
Downgrade
B+sf
F 17323VAE5
LT
CCsf
Downgrade
B-sf
Page
of 3
VIEW ADDITIONAL RATING DETAILS
KEY RATING DRIVERS
Increased 'Bsf' Loss Expectations: The deal-level 'Bsf' rating case loss has increased since Fitch's prior rating action to 8.8% in CGCMT 2015-GC29 and 4.6% in
CGCMT 2015-GC29: The downgrades on classes D, X-D, E and F reflect higher pool loss expectations since Fitch's prior rating action, driven primarily by further performance decline and refinance concerns on the office FLOCs, including Selig Office Portfolio (14.2%), Papago Arroyo (3.1%) and specially serviced
Largest Contributors to Loss: The largest contributor to overall loss expectations in CGCMT 2015-GC29 and the second largest contributor in
The largest tenants in the portfolio include
As of
The Seattle CBD submarket has seen a deterioration of performance fundamentals over the past few years. As of 1Q24 per CoStar, the office submarket asking rent was
Fitch's 'Bsf' rating case loss of 22.8% (prior to concentration add-ons) reflects a 10% cap rate, 10% stress to the YE 2022 NOI and factors a 100% probability of default due to the declining portfolio occupancy, weak market fundamentals and expected refinance concerns.
The second largest contributor to overall loss expectations in CGCMT 2015-GC29 is the Parkchester Commercial loan, secured by a 541,232-sf, mixed-use retail/office property in the
Property-level NOI has been declining since issuance mainly due to increases in expenses, along with the decline in occupancy over the past year. The servicer-reported NOI DSCR as of Q3 2023 was 0.65x, compared to 1.20x at YE 2022, 0.84x at YE 2021, 1.31x at YE 2020 and 1.14x at YE 2019. Occupancy per the
Fitch's 'Bsf' rating case loss of 28.7% (prior to concentration add-ons) reflects a 9% cap rate, 7.5% stress to the annualized Q3 2023 NOI, and factors a 100% probability of default due to the weak performance, low DSCR and heightened maturity default risk.
The third largest contributor to overall loss expectations in CGCMT 2015-GC29 is the Papago Arroyo loan, secured by a 279,504-sf suburban office property in
Occupancy as of
Fitch's 'Bsf' rating case loss of 52.4% (prior to concentration add-ons) reflects a 10.50% cap rate, 10% stress to the YE 2022 NOI, and factors a 100% probability of default due to the poor property performance, low DSCR and heightened maturity default risk.
Specially Serviced Loan: The specially serviced loan in CGCMT 2015-GC29 is
Occupancy at the subject has been depressed since
Fitch's 'Bsf' rating case loss of 29.4% (prior to concentration add-ons) reflects a 10% cap rate, 40% stress to the YE 2022 NOI, and factors a 100% probability of default due to the loan's specially serviced status, low occupancy from loss of a major tenant and anticipated refinance concerns.
The largest contributor to overall loss expectations in
The servicer-reported occupancy for the TTM
Fitch's 'Bsf' rating case loss of 34.3% (prior to concentration add-ons) reflects a 11.5% cap rate, 15% stress to the TTM
The third largest contributor to overall loss expectations in
Per the
Fitch's 'Bsf' rating case of 32.7% (prior to concentration add-ons) reflects a 9% cap rate, 20% stress to the YE 2022 NOI, and factors a 100% probability of default due to the lower occupancy and loan's heightened maturity default risk.
Increased CE: As of the
As of the
RATING SENSITIVITIES
Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action/Downgrade
Downgrades to classes rated 'AAAsf' are not expected due to the position in the capital structure and expected continued amortization and loan repayments, but may occur if deal-level losses increase significantly and/or interest shortfalls occur.
Downgrades to classes rated in the 'AAsf' and 'Asf' categories could occur if deal-level losses increase significantly from outsized losses on larger FLOCs and/or more loans than expected experience performance deterioration and/or default at or prior to maturity.
Downgrades to in the 'BBBsf', 'BBsf' and 'Bsf' categories are possible with higher than expected losses from continued underperformance of the FLOCs and/or with greater certainty of losses on the specially serviced loans and/or FLOCs.
Downgrades to 'CCCsf' and 'CCsf' rated classes would occur should additional loans transfer to special servicing and/or default, as losses be realized or become more certain.
Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Upgrade
Upgrades to classes rated in the 'AAsf' and 'Asf' category may be possible with significantly increased CE, coupled with stable-to-improved pool-level loss expectations and improved performance on the FLOCs.
Upgrades to the 'BBBsf' and 'BBsf' category rated classes would be limited based on sensitivity to concentrations or the potential for future concentration. Classes would not be upgraded above 'AA+sf' if there is likelihood for interest shortfalls.
Upgrades to 'BBsf' and 'Bsf' category rated classes could occur only if the performance of the remaining pool is stable, recoveries on the FLOCs are better than expected, and there is sufficient CE to the classes.
Upgrades to 'CCCsf' and 'CCsf' are not likely, but may be possible with better than expected recoveries on specially serviced loans and/or significantly higher values on FLOCs.
USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10
Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by, Fitch in relation to this rating action.
REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING
The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.
ESG Considerations
The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/topics/esg/products#esg-relevance-scores.
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com
(C) 2024 Electronic News Publishing, source