Summary

● The company has strong fundamentals. More than 70% of companies have a lower mix of growth, profitability, debt and visibility.

● Overall, and from a short-term perspective, the company presents an interesting fundamental situation.

● The company has a good ESG score relative to its sector, according to Refinitiv.


Strengths

● The company is in a robust financial situation considering its net cash and margin position.

● Its low valuation, with P/E ratio at 6.82 and 6.64 for the ongoing fiscal year and 2024 respectively, makes the stock pretty attractive with regard to earnings multiples.

● The stock, which is currently worth 2023 to 0.3 times its sales, is clearly overvalued in comparison with peers.

● The company's share price in relation to its net book value makes it look relatively cheap.

● The company has a low valuation given the cash flows generated by its activity.

● The company is one of the best yield companies with high dividend expectations.

● Over the past year, analysts have regularly revised upwards their sales forecast for the company.

● Growth remains a strong point in this company. In their sales forecast, analysts sound optimistic with regard to sales prospects.

● For the last few months, EPS revisions have remained quite promising. Analysts now anticipate higher profitability levels than before.

● The average price target of analysts who are interested in the stock has been strongly revised upwards over the last four months.

● Historically, the company has been releasing figures that are above expectations.


Weaknesses

● With relatively low growth outlooks, the group is not among those with the highest revenue growth potential.

● The company's currently anticipated earnings per share (EPS) growth for the next few years is a notable weakness.

● The overall consensus opinion of analysts has deteriorated sharply over the past four months.

● Over the past twelve months, analysts' opinions have been revised negatively.

● The price targets of various analysts who make up the consensus differ significantly. This reflects different assessments and/or a difficulty in valuing the company.