ASIA ASSET FINANCE PLC

COLOMBO - 03

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31ST MARCH 2022

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF ASIA ASSET FINANCE PLC

Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements

Opinion

We have audited the financial statements of Asia Asset Finance PLC ("the Company"), which comprise the statement of financial position as at 31st March 2022, and the statement of income and statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies as set out on pages 06 to 74.

In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Company as at 31st March 2022, and of its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Sri Lanka Accounting Standards.

Basis for Opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with Sri Lanka Auditing Standards (SLAuSs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the Code of Ethics issued by CA Sri Lanka (Code of Ethics) and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of the most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

Key audit matter

Impairment of loans and receivables

The Company's gross loans and receivables amount to Rs. 17.3 billion as at 31st March 2022 (2021: Rs. 14

billion) and impairment allowance for the year amounts to Rs. 493 million at 31st March 2022 (2021: Rs. 383 million).

The Company measures the impairment of loans and receivables using expected credit loss ("ECL") model as per SLFRS 9: Financial Instruments ("SLFRS 9"). The application of this standard requires management to exercise significant judgments in the determination of expected credit losses, including those relating to loans and receivables. Management applies significant judgment in the determination of estimated future cash flows, probabilities of default and forward-looking economic expectations.

Due to the significance of loans and receivables and the significant estimates and judgment involved, the impairment of these loans and receivables was considered to be a key audit matter.

The impairment provision is considered separately on an individual and collective impairment basis.

In calculating the impairment provision on a collective basis, statistical models are used. The following inputs to these models require significant management judgment:

  • the probability of default (PD);
  • the exposure at default (EAD);
  • the loss given default (LGD); and
  • the effective interest rates.

In assessing loans and receivables on an individual basis, significant judgments, estimates and assumptions have been made by management to:

  • Determine if the loan, advance, lease or hire purchase is credit impaired;
  • Evaluate the adequacy and recoverability of collateral;
  • Determine the expected cash flows to be collected; and
  • Estimate the timing of the future cash flows.

Key areas of significant judgments, estimates and assumptions used by management related to the impact of prevailing macroeconomic conditions and COVID-19 in the assessment of the impairment allowance included the following:

  • The probable impacts of prevailing macroeconomic conditions and COVID-19 and related industry responses (e.g. government stimulus packages and debt moratorium relief measures granted by the Company);
  • The determination on whether or not customer contracts have been substantially modified due to such COVID-19 related stimulus and relief measures granted and related effects on the amount of interest income recognised on affected loans and advances;
  • Forward-lookingmacroeconomic factors, including developing and incorporating macroeconomic scenarios, given the wide range of potential economic outcomes and probable impact from prevailing macroeconomic conditions and COVID-19 that may affect future expected credit losses.

The disclosures associated with impairment of loans and receivables are set out in the financial statements in the following notes:

Note 11

- Impairment charge for lease rental receivables, hire purchase and loans and advances

Note 18.8

-

Financial assets at amortised cost - Loan and advances

Note 18.7

-

Financial assets at amortised cost - Lease rental receivables and hire purchase

How our audit addressed the key audit matter:

Our procedures included the following.

  • We obtained an understanding of management's process and tested controls over credit origination, credit monitoring and credit remediation.
  • We evaluated the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of controls over estimation of impairment, which included assessing the level of oversight, review and approval of provision for credit impairment policies and procedures by the Board and management.
  • We assessed the appropriateness of the accounting policies and loan impairment methodologies applied by comparing these to the requirements of SLFRS 9: Financial Instruments, particularly in light of the deteriorating and extremely volatile economic scenarios caused by prevailing macroeconomic conditions, COVID-19 pandemic and government responses based on the best available information up to the date of our report.
  • We test-checked the underlying calculations and data.

In addition to the above, we performed the following specific procedures:

For loans and receivables collectively assessed for impairment:

  • We assessed the completeness of the underlying information in loans and receivables used in the impairment calculations by agreeing details to the Company's source documents and information in IT systems.
  • We assessed whether judgments, estimates and assumptions used by the management in the underlying methodology and the management overlays were reasonable. Our testing included evaluating the reasonableness of forward-looking information used, economic scenarios considered, and probability weighting assigned to each of those scenarios. Further, we assessed the reasonableness of the Company's considerations of the economic uncertainty relating to prevailing macroeconomic conditions and COVID-19.

For loans and receivables individually assessed for impairment:

  • We assessed the main criteria used by management for determining whether an impairment event had occurred.
  • Where impairment indicators existed, we assessed the reasonableness of management's estimated future recoveries including the expected future cash flows, discount rates and the valuation of collateral held.
  • Evaluating the reasonableness of the provisions made with particular focus on the prevailing macroeconomic conditions as well as, on the impact of COVID-19 on elevated risk industries, strategic responsive actions taken, collateral values, and the value and timing of future cashflows.

For loans and advances affected by government stimulus and debt moratorium relief measures granted:

  • Assessing the appropriateness of judgments, reasonableness of calculations and data used to determine whether customer contracts have been substantially modified or not and to determine the resulting accounting implications; and
  • Evaluating the reasonableness of the interest income recognised on such affected loans and advances. We also assessed the adequacy of the related financial statement disclosures.

Other information

Management is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report. The Annual Report is expected to be made available to us after the date of this auditor's report.

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above when it becomes available and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise whether it appears to be materially misstated.

When we read the Annual Report, if we conclude that there is a material misstatement therein, we are required to communicate the matter to those charged with governance.

Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with Sri Lanka Accounting Standards, and for such internal control as management determines, is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Company's financial reporting process.

Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SLAuSs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with SLAuSs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

  • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain an audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
  • Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control.
  • Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.

This is an excerpt of the original content. To continue reading it, access the original document here.

Attachments

  • Original Link
  • Original Document
  • Permalink

Disclaimer

Asia Asset Finance Ltd. published this content on 16 June 2022 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 16 June 2022 04:32:05 UTC.